Formal Logic: Aristotelian Logic vs. Evolutionary Integrated Atomic Logic

Formal logic, having been formulated by Aristotle, a renowned Greek philosopher, ruled unrivaled, as a form of reasoning, among the literate cultures for more than two thousand years. Its intellectual foundation was severely shaken by George Helel's idealistic dialectical logic, and was further discredited by dialectical materialist logic of Frederick Engels, Karl Marx, and Josef Dietzgen. But the university admirerers of formal logic learned to readapt its forms to the new conditions, practically incapable of revising its content. Rehabilitated, it keeps serving its social slave masters. But my evolutionary integrated atomic logic pulvarized it atomically, completely overthrowing its intellectual dictatorship, paving the way for a logic of atomic age. This book is " must read", specially for those how are famaliarized with dialectical materialit logic. Our educational system teaches us that our Universe is made of atoms, that these atoms are ubiquitous, meaning one atom is placed next to on another, with vacuum in between them. I find this description very insulting to the intelligence of man in twenty first century. In my book, by referring to, and relying upon two processes that go on in the atomic structures, meaning changes in isotope, and ionization, I have shown that atoms are integrated and interwoven, and that there is no such thing as atoms existing next to one another, as if they were distant, and indifferent neighbors. They provide all around existence for one another. If they were separate from one another, their internal energy would soon come to an end. The fact that atomic energy is eternally inexhaustible, beyond any doubt, substantiates that they are in fact interwoven, and integrated. Sub-atomic particles are being constantly born, and disappear, because of this interrelationship and interwoven-ness, and that calls for atomic transformation, and is an in-formidable fact of evolution. That calls for re-evaluation of our atomic physics, which is the foundation of all other natural sciences, and place it on two new principles, interwoven-ness, and evolution. If this is scientifically correct, we have to re-write all other natural sciences, to accommodate for this new foresight and vision. I critiqued formal logic from an evolutionary integrated atomic logic, because formal logic is a logic of the un-changeable, for ever the same thing, that preserve their identities absolutely the same and forever. This book is worthy of being taught on college, and university level, as an alternative to formal logic. But if I had offered a different summer time style bikini, I would have received more enthusiastic reception.